IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal Care Services in Health Economics: On the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off


  • Giovanna Morelli
  • Federico Spandonaro


The paper focuses on the recent evolution in performance of healthcare production in Italy. It regards the technical efficiency and equity in the use of public funds in public primary healthcare actions, concerning the funding profile in the new scenario of fiscal federalism. The analysis is directly concerned with the degree of utilisation of public resources and the production efficiency of the healthcare services provided. On a theoretical basis, healthcare services might be considered as merit goods, since they are granted directly at a first-aid level by the State on the provision of the Italian Constitution Act. At article 32, health is recognized as a fundamental right of the individual and as a collective interest; equity and equal access to all citizens are ensured. Nevertheless, this scenario may drive to a detriment of competition, to a failure in the market and to allocative inefficiencies. For the future, the growing financial responsibilities of the Italian Regions in this respect might give a solution, in which direction, at the moment, it is difficult to predict. The paper analyzes the potential impacts of decentralization reform in the healthcare sector using the technical efficiency as a parameter of evaluation of its performance; the idea is to verify possible associations among technical efficiency, equity and the funding profile of expenses with healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Morelli & Federico Spandonaro, 2010. "Personal Care Services in Health Economics: On the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off," Economia dei Servizi, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 63-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/32699:y:2010:i:1:p:63-90

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/32699:y:2010:i:1:p:63-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.