Service productivity in Italy: a descriptive analysis
This paper examines the long-run pattern of service growth which has affected the Italian economy since the seventies. The weight of this producing sector in terms of employment and income, measured by the value added to GDP ratio at current prices, is now around 70%, showing that Italy catched-up the most important advanced economies. In particular, the attention is focused on decomposition of labour productivity dynamics according to its between and within-sector components. The productivity is analyzed both for the three main sectors of business activity - i.e. agricolture, industry and services - and for the service sector in its detailed breakdown. The two components of labour productivity are named, respectively, "infrasectoral component" and "structural component". The first measures the productivity level changes inside every branch of total industries (the within effect); the second measures the productivity changes emerging from employment variations between production sectors showing different labour productivity levels. Both of them influence the productivity of whole economy. The empirical evidence shows up that Italian productivity slowdown is determined primarily by the very often advocated reduction of infrasectoral component. We point out that also the coming to nought of structural component has played an important role, reinforcing the negative trend in productivity growth. Even so, the persitent gap in productivity levels of service sectors implies, at least in theory, that remains some room for gains in whole productivity by achieving a different labour force allocation between services within the service sector.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/27347:y:2008:i:2:p:199-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.