Sensemaking and "Nonsense " in Performance Appraisal Systems
Performance appraisal systems have become usual practice both in private and in the public sector, where they have been made compulsory. Unfortunately, the way such systems are set up and run is very often self-defeating, because on the one hand final users will get messages contrasting with the real reason of creation, and on the other performance appraisal systems tend to favour opportunistic behaviours and, hence, distortions in the reward systems. This paper compares the features of the "sensemaking" process available in literature to the methods through which performance appraisal systems are usually applied; particular emphasis has been given to the analysis of the conditions of effectiveness supporting performance that need constant adaptation to complex environment. This approach is also applied to the analysis of the relation among individual performance appraisal, human resources management, planning and control systems, and their capability of creating or destroying "sense " in organizations.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/24830:y:2007:i:3:p:437-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.