IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-77264y2014i1p69-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Policy in the United States. The theoretical debate, the rhetoric, and the practices in the era of the Washington Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Mattia Tassinari

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to understand, by studying the American experience, which elements are crucial for the success of the industrial policy strategies implemented in response to contemporary issues. At this scope it is essential to re-explore in particular the American experience of the Eighties and Nineties, in the era of the Washington Consensus. In fact, in the «traditional» rhetoric of the American government, rooted in the us in those years, industrial policy has been always rejected. Thus, to understand the role that can be played by the government in contemporary economies, it is necessary to analyze the reality of the public intervention in a context that has clearly highlighted its weaknesses. In this framework, the work provides a rereading of how the American government, in the practices of public intervention, has played an active role in the promotion of the us industrial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattia Tassinari, 2014. "Industrial Policy in the United States. The theoretical debate, the rhetoric, and the practices in the era of the Washington Consensus," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 69-100.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/77264:y:2014:i:1:p:69-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/77264
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/77264
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/77264:y:2014:i:1:p:69-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.