IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-74603y2013i3p449-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrialization and Territorial Unbalances: An Explorative Analysis of the Chinese Case

Author

Listed:
  • Marco R. Di Tommaso
  • Angela Sarcina
  • Stefano Bonnini

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between industrialization, territoriesand policies in a specific area of China, namely Guangdong. We will attempt to testthe hypothesis discussed in the literature of a process of industrialization geographically unbalancedthat in the last few decades has emphasized the dualism between central areas andperipheral areas of the province. The study is developed in two phases. In the first one, thearea of Guangdong is divided in two parts, prd and non-prd. In this case we test the hypothesisthat both performances and policies are more homogeneous in the prd rather than in thenon-prd. This hypothesis is partially confirmed by the statistic tests. We then proceed we thesecond phase where the territory is further divided into 7 areas. Statistical tests show that theInner prd is actually the most industrialized area of the region. As concerns the policy intervention,data seem to confirm a shift in the distribution of policies from the center to theperiphery. Thus, what we present in this paper illustrates a path of industrialization that hasdeveloped a number of differences between territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco R. Di Tommaso & Angela Sarcina & Stefano Bonnini, 2013. "Industrialization and Territorial Unbalances: An Explorative Analysis of the Chinese Case," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 449-470.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/74603:y:2013:i:3:p:449-470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/74603
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/74603
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/74603:y:2013:i:3:p:449-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.