IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-37814y2012i3p461-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation, Rhetoric: The case of Water Utilities in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Arnaudo

Abstract

The essay synthetically analyzes the state-of-the-art of the Italian water utilities, following a reform launched by a rather ambitious law in 1994 and a confuse normative framework related to public utilities management. The results are disappointing, mainly as a consequence of the abstractness of a reform plan that did not duly considered the original industrial setting of the water sector, as well as the local features of water utilities and - what is pivotal in Italy - of public administration. The vote of a referendum held on June 2011, deeply influenced by a generic rhetoric related to water as a common/free good, unsettled an already precarious system that the national legislator wishfully (and rhetorically by itself) aimed at liberalizing by recurring to private undertakings as service managers. However, the recent endorsement of a trustworthy regulator may mark a difference from the murky situation experienced in the past, where the Italian competition authority was rather frequently acting also in order to compensate the regulatory lack. A new systemic approach, based on a polycentric governance of water as a common-pool resource and a sound general regulation well combined with an antitrust guard, is the final hope expressed by the author of the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Arnaudo, 2012. "Regulation, Rhetoric: The case of Water Utilities in Italy," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 461-474.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/37814:y:2012:i:3:p:461-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/37814
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/37814
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/37814:y:2012:i:3:p:461-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.