IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-2290y2000i3p543-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La verifica empirica del modello di Sutton per i settori manufatturieri italiani

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Letizia Giorgetti

Abstract

In this paper, an empirical test of Sutton hypothesis (1991), for Italian manufacturing sectors, on the relation between concentration and market size, is performed. The model distinguishes sectors on the basis of the sunk costs type: endogenous sunk costs vs. exogenous sunk costs. According to Sutton, the sectors with endogenous sunk costs should show higher concentration as market size goes to infinite than sectors with exogenous sunk costs; for the first type of sectors it should also be present a break-down of the inverse relation between concentration and market size. Another hypothesis of Sutton is a quicker convergence towards low value of concentration for sectors with exogenous sunk costs. In this paper, these hypotheses are tested for Italy, using the four macrosectors as determined by Davies and Lyons (1996) and by Robinson and Chiang (1996).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Letizia Giorgetti, 2000. "La verifica empirica del modello di Sutton per i settori manufatturieri italiani," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 543-564.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/2290:y:2000:i:3:p:543-564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/2290
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/2290
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvana Robone & Alberto Zanardi, 2006. "Market structure and technology: evidence from the Italian National Health Service," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 215-236, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/2290:y:2000:i:3:p:543-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.