IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-2273y2000i1p159-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Se gli apparati amministrativi sono "catturati" dagli esperti... L'ironia della riforma delle telecomunicazioni

Author

Listed:
  • D. Linda Garcia

Abstract

This paper examines the shortfalls of the 1996 Telecommunications Act in terms of the concept of regulatory failure. Looking at the efforts of the FCC over the past two years to define and operationalize the goals of the Ac in an historical/institutional context, it suggests than the problem at the FCC has not been one of "capture by special interests" but rather one of "capture by experts". This capture, it is argued, has occurred because the FCC staff - so intent on avoiding industry capture - has tended to mold and shape the decision-making process so that issues must be presented and resolved in accordance with their own, relatively narrow, professional standards and discipline - namely economics. While policy decisions based on such "expert" criteria and methodologies is often highly appropriate - given a broad consensus on policy goals and outcomes - it is far less likely to be effective today in such a high stakes and uncertain communications environment.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Linda Garcia, 2000. "Se gli apparati amministrativi sono "catturati" dagli esperti... L'ironia della riforma delle telecomunicazioni," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 159-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/2273:y:2000:i:1:p:159-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/2273
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/2273
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/2273:y:2000:i:1:p:159-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.