IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jsss88/v3y2016i2p103-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corpus-Based Versus Traditional Collocation Learning: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Elham Mohammadi Foomani
  • Karim Khalaji

Abstract

A vital aspect of word knowledge is knowledge of collocations. Regarding its central role in accurate and fluent use of words, it is essential to consider collocation learning as integral to the study of vocabulary. While different methods are proposed for teaching collocations, the efficiency of these methods is yet subject to question. This study sought to investigate the effectiveness of corpus-based learning of verb-noun collocations as opposed to the traditional methods. To this aim Collin Collocation Dictionary was used as a concordancing tool for learning collocations. Forty five upper-intermediate students divided randomly into control and experimental groups were studied. A pre-test was conducted to both groups before the experiment. Next, in 4 subsequent weeks, the experimental group was provided with 24 concordance collocations and was required to identify the collocations and miscollocations while the control group received traditional collocation training through texts. At the end of the teaching procedure a post-test as well as a writing task were administered to compare students¡¯ collocation learning and their accurate application of collocations in the writing task. In a final step, an interview was conducted to gain insight into students¡¯ perceptions of the design. The results indicated the experimental groups¡¯ advantage in collocation acquisition as well as their application in writings. The interview results with seven students indicated their positive perceptions of the corpus-based design despite the reported limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Elham Mohammadi Foomani & Karim Khalaji, 2016. "Corpus-Based Versus Traditional Collocation Learning: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 103-116, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jsss88:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:103-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/8922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/8922
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jsss88:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:103-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.