IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jad888/v4y2018i2p133-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project

Author

Listed:
  • Erni Murniarti
  • Bernard Nainggolan
  • Hulman Panjaitan
  • L.Elly AM Pandiangan
  • I Dewi Ayu Widyani
  • Saniago Dakhi

Abstract

A debatable consensus on and appropriate approaches to literature review function as the theoretical background of the paper. It redefines the literature review substance, synthesis, and procedure to literature matrix, and literature review assessment. In addition, some implications are to interpret the discussion. Finally, finding of the present study is applicable to any study fields at it generally provides matrix for which writing literature review can be easily conducted. Suggestions, identical to the potential of further studies and its application by on-going researcher and writer, are holistically provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Erni Murniarti & Bernard Nainggolan & Hulman Panjaitan & L.Elly AM Pandiangan & I Dewi Ayu Widyani & Saniago Dakhi, 2018. "Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project," Journal of Asian Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 133-146, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jad888:v:4:y:2018:i:2:p:133-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jad/article/view/13895/10971
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jad/article/view/13895
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie & Rebecca K. Weinbaum, 2016. "Mapping Miles and Huberman’s Within-Case and Cross-Case Analysis Methods onto the Literature Review Process," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 265288-2652, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jad888:v:4:y:2018:i:2:p:133-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jad .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.