IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijgs88/v2y2018i1p24-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Selected Commercial Banks in India using CAMELS Rating Model

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth M. Samuel

Abstract

Sound financial health of a bank is the guarantee not only to its depositors but is equally significant for the shareholders, employees and whole economy as well. As sequel to this maxim, efforts have been made from time to time to measure the financial position of each bank and manage it efficiently and effectively. Indian banking sector widely includes commercial, nationalized, co-operative, private and international banks in its fold. In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate the financial performance of three major commercial banks (IOB, Canara Bank and Syndicate Bank) using CAMELS Rating Model. CAMELS rating model is basically an approach widely used to measure the performance of banking unit inside and outside India. This model measures the performance of banks from all important parameters like Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management efficiency, Earning quality, Liquidity and sensitivity to market. The study is based on secondary data drawn from the annual reports. For the purpose of evaluation the data¡¯s of five years (2011-2016) before demonetization are analyzed by calculating the 17 ratios related to CAMELS rating model. It is found out that according to Basel Norm the overall state of capital adequacy of all the three banks are satisfactory. As far as loan portfolio is concern, the overall state of asset quality and management efficiency are satisfactory, whereas the earning capacity of the banks is not and the liquidity is also not satisfactory. The high level of NPAs and sluggishness in the domestic growth, slow recovery in the global economy and the continuing uncertainty in the global market leading to lower exports and imports are one of the main reasons for the low earning capacity of banks along with these reasons RBI¡¯s new rules to make higher provisioning for substandard assets also affected the earning capacity of all the three banks. Based on the evaluations all the three commercial banks should improve its earning capacity and the liquidity position to perform efficiently and effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth M. Samuel, 2018. "Comparative Performance Evaluation of Selected Commercial Banks in India using CAMELS Rating Model," International Journal of Global Sustainability, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 24-38, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijgs88:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:24-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijgs/article/view/12576
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijgs/article/view/12576
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Babatunde Rahman YUSUF & Jamiu Olakunle TIJANI, 2019. "An Evaluation of Financial Health of Nigerian Deposit Money Banks using CAMELS Rating Model," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 48-61.
    2. Hari Gopal Risal & Sabin Bikram Panta, 2019. "CAMELS-Based Supervision and Risk Management: What Works and What Does Not," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 194-204, September.
    3. Saleh Jawarneh, 2022. "Determinants of Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Jordan: Application of CAMELS Model," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 18(01), pages 75-82.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijgs88:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:24-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.