IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr21_04_02s.html

Business cycle indicators have traditionally been expected to capture the common cyclical factors across the economy. More recently, however, a new perspective has emerged ―one that defines business cycles as fluctuations in the aggregate level of economic activity.Under this new view, consumption data from household surveys play a more important role, as they provide comprehensive coverage of consumption ― the largest component of GDP and allow for flexible decomposition useful for business cycle assessment. Until now, the only demand-side source of consumption data has been the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), which has not been fully utilized as a business cycle indicator due to concerns over its accuracy. To address these challenges, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications began publishing the Consumption Trend Index (CTI-micro) in 2018. This index is constructed by integrating the FIES with the Survey of Household Economy and the Expenditure Monitor Survey for One-person Households. While the CTI-micro is useful for tracking average household consumption, its ability to reflect macro-consumption trends is limited—especially amid rising ratios of single-person households and an increasing number of households overall. To address this limitation, this paper constructs a Population-Adjusted CTI-micro, which incorporates household count data from the Labor Force Survey, and examines its potential use as a real-time business cycle indicator. The Population-Adjusted CTI-micro effectively tracks the macro-consumption in the GDP statistics over the medium term. It allows for flexible decomposition and offers advantages over the CTI-macro, which estimates total consumption only as a single aggregate series. Although the index exhibits relatively large short-term fluctuations, it remains a valuable and sensitive tool for detecting changes in economic conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Unayama Takashi

    (Professorat Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Unayama Takashi, 2025. "Business cycle indicators have traditionally been expected to capture the common cyclical factors across the economy. More recently, however, a new perspective has emerged ―one that defines business cycles as fluctuations in the aggregate level of ec," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 21(4), pages 1-29, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_04_02s
    DOI: 10.57520/prippr.21-4-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.57520/prippr.21-4-2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.57520/prippr.21-4-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_04_02s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.