IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr20_04_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developments in the Compliance Mechanisms of Free Trade Agreements ―Implications from the Labor and the Environment Chapters in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) ―

Author

Listed:
  • Mio Otashiro

    (Visiting Scholar, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

  • Kohei Akiyama

    (Visiting Scholar, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

Abstract

Three years have passed since the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) entered into force. USMCA is considered the most important tool to achieve a “worker-centered trade policy” advanced by the Biden administration and includes a “Facility-Specific Rapid-Response Labor Mechanism (RRM)” to ensure compliance with obligations under the labor chapter, which had never been included in trade agreements. RRM has already built up a track record of 14 cases and is exerting widespread influence over corporate behavior within the covered areas. Similarly, regarding the environment, continuous efforts can be seen to ensure compliance with environmental obligations through an improvement to a previous mechanism of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The labor and the environment are increasingly being emphasized not only for the protection of their fundamental values, but also from the perspectives of ensuring a level playing field, as well as building a resilient supply chain. The important feature of USMCA labor and environment chapters is having strengthened compliance procedures with the involvement of non-state actors such as trade unions, environmental organizations, and the civil society, in addition to conventional state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism. Through the consideration of the current status of the compliance mechanisms for the labor and the environment chapters in USMCA, this article shows some developments in the compliance mechanisms included in the labor and the environment chapters of free trade agreements and considers their implication on new U.S.-led negotiations such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF).

Suggested Citation

  • Mio Otashiro & Kohei Akiyama, 2024. "Developments in the Compliance Mechanisms of Free Trade Agreements ―Implications from the Labor and the Environment Chapters in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) ―," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr20_04_06
    DOI: 10.57520/prippr.20-4-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.57520/prippr.20-4-6
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.57520/prippr.20-4-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA); Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF); Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity (APEP); trade and labor; trade and environment; dispute settlement mechanism; compliance mechanism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr20_04_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.