IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr17_01_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationales and Challenges for a Digital Service Tax:Focusing on Location-Specific Rent

Author

Listed:
  • Tetsuya Watanabe

    (Professor of Law, Waseda University, Japan)

Abstract

A discussion, focusing on the present-day OECD, is being carried out with regard to taxation that is compatible with the digitalization of the economy. Despite the efforts of the OECD, each country has been working on the introduction of a digital service tax through unilateral or interim measures. Such a tax has been criticized as an ambush, as not allowing coordination under treaty agreements, and as a system that targets specific companies. However, Professor Wei Cui has observed in relation to a digital service tax that digital platforms would earn Location-Specific Rents in conditions not unlike those that arise when mining natural resources, and contends that this has a rationale in the user’s country’s right to tax digital platform corporations. The present paper explores the rationale behind a digital service tax through Cui’s opinion and expert analyses responding to it. The important factors in this discussion include the fact that businesses that run digital platforms with controlling power in the market have a dual nature and indirectly network effects; the fact that marginal costs are currently low and that the revenue of takings has been shown to be very close to profits; and the fact that there is scope for the view that coordination under treaty agreements is not necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetsuya Watanabe, 2021. "Rationales and Challenges for a Digital Service Tax:Focusing on Location-Specific Rent," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr17_01_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr17_01_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Favourate Y. Mpofu & Tankiso Moloi, 2022. "Direct Digital Services Taxes in Africa and the Canons of Taxation," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr17_01_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.