IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr029f.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in European Corporate Group Law Systems and the Future of Japan fs Corporate Law System

Author

Listed:
  • Koji Funatsu

    (Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Doshisha University)

Abstract

Balancing the interests of the parent company (the corporate group as a whole) and those of its subsidiaries when managing a corporate group is a challenge in corporate law. To address this challenge, legislative proposals based on the understanding that protecting the interests of subsidiaries should be the top priority have been repeatedly presented in Japan and Europe. However, in Europe, rules that appear to place priority on the activities of parent companies and corporate groups as a whole have recently been presented due to the practice of conducting corporate activities on a group basis and the effects of globalisation. This paper closely examines recent debates concerning this matter in Europe and identifies the factors that have brought changes in the basic thinking behind the debates. By doing so, the paper reviews existing views concerning corporate group law system in Japan (particularly in relation to the management of groups) and presents points of attention concerning how to proceed with future debates.

Suggested Citation

  • Koji Funatsu, 2015. "Trends in European Corporate Group Law Systems and the Future of Japan fs Corporate Law System," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 11(3), pages 475-484, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr029f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/11217434/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr029/ppr029f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr029f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.