IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr014b.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Analysis of Japan's Fiscal Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Junji Ueda

    (Associate Professor, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University)

  • Tatsuya Sugiura

    (Senior Economist, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

Abstract

At the outset of this analysis of fiscal sustainability in Japan, we first reviewed the methodologies adopted in previous studies. Taking FY2009 as our starting point, we developed a long-term estimate of fiscal conditions based on the economic and demographic assumptions in the study of pension financing published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Feb. 2009). We then used the results of this estimation to calculate fiscal sustainability gaps for various target scenarios, based on an approach adopted by the European Commission. According to our calculations, the sustainability gap necessary to attain the EU-envisaged target of 60% of adjusted state debt ratio to GDP in 2050 is 6.9% of GDP. The sustainability gap necessary for both state and municipal debt ratio to GDP to attain 60% is 8.2% of GDP. Comparing our results with those in Broda and Weinstein (2005) and Doi (2008), we found that estimates of future expenditure levels in a simulation were a significant factor in determining sustainability gaps. In addition, we considered the interactions between the economy and fiscal conditions, and generated simulation results of mid-term economic and fiscal conditions based on certain scenarios. Finally, we determined various tasks remaining for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Junji Ueda & Tatsuya Sugiura, 2011. "Simulation Analysis of Japan's Fiscal Sustainability," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 7(2), pages 299-336, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr014b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://warp.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/10212195/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr014/ppr014b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr014b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.