Marginal Productivity Principle and Measurement Biases in TFP: Evidence from International Productivity Database
Trends and changes in total factor productivity (TFP) have been the subject of a considerable amount of research from both theoretical and empirical approaches, at both the microeconomic and macroeconomic levels, as a driver of economic growth and fluctuations. A traditional growth accounting method employed in such research assumes the marginal productivity principle iMPP jfor factors of production. In this paper, we conduct international comparison of TFP growth rates between those measured when assuming the MPP and those measured when not assuming it, to determine the degree of deviation in TFP growth rates under different assumptions and examine its causes from the perspective of business cycles, using data on the five developed nations (Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France), When not assuming the MPP, TFP measurement requires identification and estimation of the production function. After comprehensive judgment of the results of various estimates conducted under differing assumptions, we decided to employ a Cobb-Douglas production function. Based on this, we compared traditional TFP growth rates assuming the MPP and technological or true TFP growth rates not assuming the MPP, to measure and assess the bias by which the marginal productivity of labor and capital deviate from the rewards of each. For Japan, we conducted similar analysis using panel data at an industry level. The results of this measurement show that, while conditions vary by country and over time, the size of the bias is of a level that cannot be ignored in comparison with the level of the traditional TFP growth rate, and consequently that the degree to which the traditional TFP growth rate deviates from the true technological TFP growth rate is, at some times and in some cases, clearly not inconsequential. Putting another way, the likelihood is high that the marginal productivity bias and deviation between the two TFP growth rate indicators is cyclical and characterizes the historical business cycle in each nation.
Volume (Year): 6 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.mof.go.jp/pri/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr008c. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Policy Research Institute)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.