IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr003a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firms' Perceptions of the Business Cycle and Their Managerial and Financial Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Kazumi Asako

    (Professor, Hitotsubashi University)

  • Koichi Ando

    (Deputy Chief Researcher, Development Bank of Japan)

  • Kazuyuki Matsumoto

    (Professor, Rikkyo University)

Abstract

Perception of the business cycle can differ among firms, which has been confirmed by extensive survey data. The question we want to answer in this paper is "What causes differences in business cycle perception?" by utilizing a newly designed questionnaire. Specifically, we match properties emphasizing the absolute level of economic activities or the direction of their changes and indicators of a firm's managerial and financial conditions, and examine the relationship between them. Based on our results, we could not find a particular indicator for the properties of firms that indicate level or trend change. However, a higher level of capital or number of employees suggests a tendency to emphasize change or rate of change, rather than the level of the business survey index. With regards to the time horizon of the business cycle, profit ratios (profit against sales or total assets) in general are good indicators. Firms with a high debt ratio tend to be myopic. Regression analysis shows that firms with high rates of investment/sales significantly tend to have a long-term vision.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazumi Asako & Koichi Ando & Kazuyuki Matsumoto, 2007. "Firms' Perceptions of the Business Cycle and Their Managerial and Financial Conditions," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr003a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://warp.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/9908001/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr003/ppr003a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr003a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.