IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Corporate Crisis And Crisis Strategy Implementation

Listed author(s):
  • Mia Glamuzina
  • Marina Lovrincevic
Registered author(s):

    Crisis creates or can create undesirable outcome for corporations. Corporation's most often response to a crisis is implementation of a radical change, which represents management's reaction to a direct and for survival of the company dangerous threat. Management, that implements crisis strategies, must be able to manage change during crisis. Based on the estimation of the corporation's condition and desired outcome, strategies implemented during crisis can end up with two diametrically opposite effects -- corporate survival or leaving the business. Business failure is not the only solution for a company in crisis. Successful turnaround and crisis solution are a possible option, but a possibility of an option doesn't guarantee that it is a most probable option. Successful turnaround and crisis solutions don't occur spontaneously; they are triggered by corporate management, its creativity and courage to implement radical change. This research is based on investigating internal and external sources of corporate crisis and a role of major stakeholders in the process of corporate recovery. The research includes investigation of corporate response during crisis and this could broaden our basic understanding of strategy implementation role in the extremely delicate moment of company's life. Since corporate crisis negatively affects company's goals and can lead to corporate breakdown, this research is offering results of an empirical investigation that determines modes how companies in a crisis manage change and how managers choose and implement offensive and defensive strategies suitable to crisis conditions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT) in its journal Montenegrin Journal of Economics.

    Volume (Year): 9 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 89-100

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:89-100
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:89-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nikola Draskovic Jelcic)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.