IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mje/mjejnl/v7y2011i2p35-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Interpretation Of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Jurij Osipov

Abstract

The paper tries to explain the philosophical-economic interpretation of economics, which is very different from common beliefs found in available textbooks and other sources of academic style. The author tries to answer the question about what economics is in terms of factography, oriented toward the surrounding reality. He starts from the hypothesis that economic atitivities individually and economy as a whole are not entirely of economic nature, but only partly, to the extent to which they are connected (mediated) with prices and money. It has lead to the conclusion that modern economy is a virtual-informational game and computer magic. Virtual multiplication of fundings nullifies the value category and reduces it to the absurd multiplicative fiction. Modern economy is dominantly global, with no bottoms or boundaries. It is ruled by the montruous energy of self-will not being subjected neither to man as the subject, nor the social system. It is economics for itself, in which the economic principle serves its own interests. Therefore contemporary economics is extremely dangerous, since it unstoppable deepens and expands existential and anti-economic pit of the entire manhood.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurij Osipov, 2011. "Alternative Interpretation Of Economics," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 7(2), pages 35-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:35-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2011/v07-n02/mje_2011_v07-n02-a11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2011/v07-n02/mje_2011_v07-n02-a11.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:31-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Aurelija Puraite & Saulius Greichius & Danguole Seniutiene, 2017. "Managing State Border in the Context of Migration Crisis in Europe - Lithuanian Case," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(3), pages 31-42.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:35-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikola Draskovic Jelcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mnje.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.