IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v18y2021i4p367-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond symbolic policy making: The Copenhagen School, migration, and the marked-unmarked analogue

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Hirschauer

    (New Mexico State University, United States.)

Abstract

This article problematizes the securitization of migration through symbolic policy discourse. Policy as discourse is not innocent. It creates not only instrumental outcomes, but can also signal deeply ideological and profound, symbolic meanings. This study discusses Germany’s controversial ANKER Center policy as a form of such symbolic signaling. Distinguishing between negative and positive securitization, this article then brings into focus the non-linear, non-fixed, political, and social construction of these two forms of securitization in the context of migration. Framed in part by the author’s ongoing field work with migrant organizations and volunteer groups in southern Germany, this article draws specific attention to a discursive marked-unmarked asymmetry. It then applies the sociologists’ method of ‘marking everything’ as a strategy to ‘write against’ securitization’s negative logic—toward a positive, more inclusive migration agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Hirschauer, 2021. "Beyond symbolic policy making: The Copenhagen School, migration, and the marked-unmarked analogue," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 18(4), pages 367-380, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:367-380
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i4.1136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ml/article/view/1136/1087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i4.1136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:367-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.