IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v17y2020i2p229-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Research: Still a One-Sided Research Agenda?

Author

Listed:
  • Derya Ozkul

    (University of Oxford, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of the term over the last two decades, scholars have not agreed on a definition of, or approach towards, participation, although critiques have emphasised that participation is not an equal process for all parties involved. By reviewing the literature and giving examples from fieldwork carried out in Lebanon, this article agrees with the common critique around participation and reflects over the limitations resulting from inherent power imbalances between researchers and participants and among community members. It also argues that the “glorification of methods” alone disguises the politics and the one-sided nature of participatory research and disregards the question of to what extent participants are involved in the construction of the methodology. This article suggests that –despite the pressure from funders to find out innovative methods –participatory researchers would benefit from understanding participants’ own ways of conceptualising and investigating a phenomenon, in order tobuild their methodology. This article explores these questions, particularly in research with migrants and refugees.

Suggested Citation

  • Derya Ozkul, 2020. "Participatory Research: Still a One-Sided Research Agenda?," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:229-237
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i2.804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ml/article/view/804/730
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i2.804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:229-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.