IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v16y2019i4p611-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nepali Women’s Labour Migration: Between Protection and Proscription

Author

Listed:
  • Bandita Sijapati

    (Social Science Baha, Centre for the Study of Labour and Mobility, Nepal)

  • Joelle Mak

    (Faculty of Public Health & Policy, Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom)

  • Cathy Zimmerman

    (Faculty of Public Health & Policy, Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom)

  • Ligia Kiss

    (Faculty of Public Health & Policy, Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom)

Abstract

With the increase in female migration, especially in the domestic sector, and accompanying reports of worker exploitation and abuse, labour-sending countries are grappling with questions about how to protect these workers. Drawing on a critical feminist policy analysis framework, this article analyses the policy and regulatory frameworks of Nepal related to female labour migration and examines their implications. Our analysis indicates that Nepal’s policy regime is constituted by a set of measures which are simultaneously liberal, protective and restrictive, and as such, they have not altered the structural conditions and economic reasons for women’s migration. Instead, women appear to be largely uninformed about government regulations, and most importantly, working conditions abroad are not affected by sending country policies, including the various migration bans put in place to protect women.

Suggested Citation

  • Bandita Sijapati & Joelle Mak & Cathy Zimmerman & Ligia Kiss, 2019. "Nepali Women’s Labour Migration: Between Protection and Proscription," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 16(4), pages 611-624, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:611-624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/index.php/ml/article/view/847
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:611-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.