IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v13y2016i1p144-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Pardon Regulation’: Implementation and outcome of a regularisation programme in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Smit

    () (Justice Administration, Legislation, International and Alien Affairs (RWI) of the Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), Ministry of Security and Justice, The Netherlands.)

  • Moira Galloway

    (Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers, The Netherlands)

  • Mina Vijkhuijs

    (Crisis Management Research Group of the Institute for Safety/Police Academy, The Netherlands)

  • Mariska Kromhout

    (Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Regularisation programmes that are intended to legalise the stay of undocumented migrants may provoke public resistance and heated political debates. Governments nevertheless go ahead with such programmes. In the Netherlands, a regularisation programme to settle the legacy of an old Aliens Law, known as the ‘Pardon Regulation’, was implemented in 2007. In this contribution we describe the implementation and outcome of the Pardon Regulation, which led to over 28,000 regularisations. We focus on the question to what extent pitfalls that were experienced in a number of regularisation programmes in other European countries were avoided and intended goals were met.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Smit & Moira Galloway & Mina Vijkhuijs & Mariska Kromhout, 2016. "The ‘Pardon Regulation’: Implementation and outcome of a regularisation programme in the Netherlands," Migration Letters, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 13(1), pages 144-158, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:144-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.tplondon.com/index.php/ml/article/viewFile/413/440
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:144-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (I. Sirkeci). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.