IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v2y2021i1p61-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Life or Pro-Choice? Humanistic Buddhists’ Voices Surrounding Abortion in Contemporary Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Cheng-Ying Lin

    (John Abbott College, Canada.)

Abstract

This paper examines the voices surrounding abortion expressed by monasteries in Humanistic Buddhism in Taiwan. As the fundamental principle of ethics, non-harming (ahimsā) prioritizes the value of life. Master Yin Shun and Master Sheng Yen claim that a fetus is a sentient being, and abortion is a sin. Master Chao Hwei further demands a strategy that truly protects the women and the fetus in the patriarchal context. On the other hand, Master Hsing Yun, employing utilitarianism, states that a woman possesses the best knowledge of the consequences of an abortion. Master Hai Tao promotes a newly popularized ritual to appease aborted fetuses, while some monasteries are critical of its possible exploitation of women and manipulation of scriptures. The wide spectrum of Buddhist narratives challenges the pro-life vs. pro-choice mode of debate. Furthermore, the diversity of the narratives shows how reproductive politics in Taiwan is embedded within the conflicts between modernity and tradition, as well as locality and globality.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Cheng-Ying Lin, 2021. "Pro-Life or Pro-Choice? Humanistic Buddhists’ Voices Surrounding Abortion in Contemporary Taiwan," International Journal of Religion, Wise Press, UK, vol. 2(1), pages 61-80, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:61-80
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijor.co.uk/ijor/article/view/1107/1044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    I;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:61-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wise (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijor.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.