IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v2y2021i1p35-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Eclecticism: Feminist-Pragmatist Reflections on Re/centering Muslims in Research about Islam

Author

Listed:
  • Sariya Cheruvallil-Contractor

    (Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, United Kingdom.)

Abstract

For over a decade, researchers have consistently asserted that Muslims in the West are ‘research weary’ (Sangera and Thapar- Bjökert 2008: 544), ‘tired of too much research about them’ (Alvi et al. 2003: p. xv) and are concerned about ‘not being given the opportunity to shape research that is about them (Scott-Baumann et al. 2020). Research on Muslim in Britain and in the West are further complicated by social hierarchies and popular discourses that often position Muslims as the ‘different other’. Working within a feminist-pragmatist epistemological framework this chapter will bring together methodological reflections from a decade of research of Islam and Muslims in the West. It asserts the need for research paradigms that are grounded in partnership and positionality, and which maintain intellectual rigour while also being accountable to the people who are the subjects of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sariya Cheruvallil-Contractor, 2021. "Methodological Eclecticism: Feminist-Pragmatist Reflections on Re/centering Muslims in Research about Islam," International Journal of Religion, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2(1), pages 35-45, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:35-45
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ijor/article/view/1472/1039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:35-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.