IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v1y2020i1p91-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet T. Kuru

    (San Diego State University, USA)

Abstract

There exist severe restrictions over religious dissent in most Muslim-majority countries. This problem is associated with the alliance between religious and political authorities in these cases. I argue that the alliance between Islamic scholars (the ulema) and the state authorities was historically constructed, instead of being a characteristic of Islam. Hence, the essentialist idea that Islaminherently rejects religion-state separation, whereas Christianity endorses it, is misleading. Instead, this article shows that the ulema-state alliance in the Muslim world was constructed after the mid-eleventh century, as well as revealing that the church-state separation in Western Europe was also historically institutionalized during that period. Using comparative-historical methods, the article explains the political and socioeconomic backgrounds of these epochal transformations. It particularly focuses on the relations between religious, political, intellectual, and economic classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet T. Kuru, 2020. "Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?," International Journal of Religion, Wise Press, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 91-104, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:91-104
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijor.co.uk/ijor/article/view/982/865
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:91-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wise (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijor.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.