IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v1y2020i1p135-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tar & Feathers: Agnotology, Dissent, and Queer Mormon History

Author

Listed:
  • Nerida Bullock

    (Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada)

Abstract

In 2014 the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) updated their official website to include information about the polygamy/polyandry practiced by Joseph Smith, their founder and prophet, and his many wives. The admission by the LDS Church reconciles the tension between information that had become readily available online since the 1990s and church-sanctioned narratives that obscured Smith’s polygamy while concurrently focusing on the polygyny of Brigham Young, Smith’s successor. This paper entwines queer theory with Robert Proctor’s concept of agnotology—a term used to describe the epistemology of ignorance, to consider dissent from two interrelated perspectives: 1) how dissent from feminists and historians within theLDS Church challenged(mis)constructions of Mormon history, and; 2) how the Mormon practice of polygamy in the late nineteenth century dissented from Western sexual mores that conflated monogamy with Whiteness, democracy and social progression in the newly formed American Republic.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerida Bullock, 2020. "Tar & Feathers: Agnotology, Dissent, and Queer Mormon History," International Journal of Religion, Wise Press, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 135-149, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:135-149
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijor.co.uk/ijor/article/view/1104/854
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.1104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wise (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijor.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.