IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v1y2020i1p121-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissenting Yogis: The Mīmāṁsaka-Buddhist Battle for Epistemological Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Jed Forman

    (University of California Santa Barbara, California, United States)

Abstract

While dissent connotes a type of split or departure, it can bind as much as it separates. This paper traces a millennium-long history of debate between Buddhists and other religionists who championed the Vedic authority rejected by the Buddha, a camp that came to be known as “Mīmāṁsā.”Myanalysis illustrates dissent can have the paradoxical feature of forging strong relationships through its seeming antithesis: opposition.Specifically, I explore Mīmāṁsaka-Buddhist debate on meditation. Buddhists argued that meditation could yield authoritative spiritual insight once a meditator had honed their yogic perception (yogipratyakṣa). Mīmāṁsakas rejected yogic perception, arguing only the scriptural corpus of the Vedas had authority. By undermining yogic perception, Mīmāṁsakas aimed to defang religious movements, like the Buddhists’, who appealed to meditative experience as legitimate grounds for dissent. Counterintuitively, such exchanges were essential for the construction of each faction’s identity and were continually mutually formative over the long history of their interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jed Forman, 2020. "Dissenting Yogis: The Mīmāṁsaka-Buddhist Battle for Epistemological Authority," International Journal of Religion, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 121-134, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:121-134
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.1080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ijor/article/view/1080/861
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.1080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:121-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.