IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ecohjl/v2y2023i1p161-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Isn’t Self-destruction Coded into Us, Programmed into Each Cell?”: A Thanatological, Posthumanist Reading of Alex Garland’s Annihilation (2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Kosonen

    (University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

Abstract

As both a novel (VanderMeer, 2014) and cinematic adaptation (Garland, 2018), Annihilation has engaged posthumanist and ecocritical scholars seeking to answer to the demand for art forms to participate in the renegotiation of the grand narratives feeding the ongoing environmental crisis and chipping away at the liveability of Planet Earth. In my reading of Alex Garland’s film, I discuss how its depiction of death adds to these discussions by challenging the human exceptionalism built into meaning-making processes, which have situated humans as above “nature,” including death, by defining human life as more valuable than all other life. As an umbrella term covering these varied processes, I discuss biopower, which seeks to regulate life by forbidding death in humans and denying life to other kind of life forms. I locate Annihilation within films that make use of the cinematic mode of ecohorror, exploring human fears and anxieties relating to death and “monstrous nature” with an ecocritical twist. I employ film analysis and draw theoretically on thanatological and posthumanist discussions, as I reflect on the kind of understanding of death that arises in Annihilation and centre on the discussion of self-destruction and suicide in discussing the human character Josie’s death in relation to the film’s non-human actant, The Shimmer.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Kosonen, 2023. "“Isn’t Self-destruction Coded into Us, Programmed into Each Cell?”: A Thanatological, Posthumanist Reading of Alex Garland’s Annihilation (2018)," Journal of Ecohumanism, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2(2), pages 161-175, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:161-175
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v2i2.3007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ecohumanism/article/view/3007/2204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v2i2.3007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:161-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.