IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ecohjl/v1y2022i1p45-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing an Immanent Sublime: Ecosophical Aesthetics as “Ecstatic Truth” in Werner Herzog’s Lessons of Darkness (1992)

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Gardner

    (UC Santa Barbara, United States)

Abstract

On its release in 1992, Werner Herzog’s quasi-documentary, Lessons of Darkness, was heavily criticised for ‘aestheticizing’ the ecological devastation of the First Gulf War by combining dream-like images of the Kuwaiti oil field fires with an overly romanticized soundtrack dominated by Wagner’s operas. Herzog’s response was that he was striving to move beyond what he calls ‘the accountant’s truth’ of Cinéma Vérité and achieve instead an ‘ecstatic truth,’ a term derived from Longinus which categorizes the sublime as a combination of immanent terror and delightful horror that strives not to persuade or educate the viewer but to entrance them, thereby attaining a higher form of truth, much like Nietzsche’s definition of art as ‘the highest power of falsehood,’ whereby ‘the will to deception is turned into a superior ideal.’ The essay then applies this form of ecstatic sublime to Félix Guattari’s ecosophical strategy, outlined in The Three Ecologies, where the usual dialectic between subject and object/nature, virtual and actual, fiction and documentary is dissolved in favour of nonhuman, interactive singularities, which act as a dynamic intersection for a series of autonomous vectors that radically transform ecology (and its associated activism) as we know it.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Gardner, 2022. "Constructing an Immanent Sublime: Ecosophical Aesthetics as “Ecstatic Truth” in Werner Herzog’s Lessons of Darkness (1992)," Journal of Ecohumanism, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 45-56, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:45-56
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v1i1.1735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ecohumanism/article/view/1735/1470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v1i1.1735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:45-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.