IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ecohjl/v1y2022i1p31-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interstitial Spatiality and Subversive Sustainability: Urban Foraging in Ava Chin’s Eating Wildly and Rita Wong’s forage

Author

Listed:
  • Yiyi He

    (Queen’s University, K7L3N6, Canada)

Abstract

I apply political ecologist Ryan Galt’s concept of ‘subversive and interstitial food spaces’ (Galt et al., 2014, 133) to read Chinese American writer Ava Chin’s semi-autobiographical memoir, Eating Wildly (2014), and Chinese Canadian writer Rita Wong’s poem collection, forage (2007). Beyond offering a different cultural perspective, I argue that Chin’s and Wong’s urban foraging narratives can be read as transitioning from being interstitial to subversive in the North American context. I see urban spaces where plants are foraged but not normally considered to be cultivatable as interstitial. Analogously, I regard people situated between cultures or on the margins of dominant spaces due to their race or class as being in an interstitial position. Echoing ancient East Asian and specifically Chinese environmental thinking, which is relational, non-linear, and non-dichotomous, Chin’s and Wong’s foraging discourses in their poetic, eth(n)ic, and environmental complexities challengedominant white foraging narratives and provide alternatives to mainstream environmental thinking. Both urban foraging experiences depicted in Eating Wildly and forage thrive from interstitial spatiality, yet they direct us toward subversive and sustainable foodways that promotes food justice and dismantles rural-urban, local-global, human-nature binaries. I will also highlight how the two authors differ in their foraging poetics and politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiyi He, 2022. "Interstitial Spatiality and Subversive Sustainability: Urban Foraging in Ava Chin’s Eating Wildly and Rita Wong’s forage," Journal of Ecohumanism, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 31-43, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:31-43
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v1i1.1841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ecohumanism/article/view/1841/1469
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v1i1.1841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ecohjl:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:31-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.