IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

An Analysis of Diversity Management Through Cultural Dimensions

Listed author(s):
  • Ana Sperancin


Registered author(s):

    Dealing with social pressure for equal treatment and opportunities has been one of the most important business issues in modern times. Countries are dealing with this issue in different ways, with different approaches and levels of maturity according to their values and particular characteristics. Of all the possible reasons that can justify this disparity, it is assumed that the differences observed in the level of national culture can denote a plausible explanation for the differences found in the approach to diversity management in distinct countries.Therefore, this study has the purpose of investigating the differences in cultural dimensions among the Member States of the European Union and their impact on the level of diversity management practiced in these countries. The dimensions of culture analyzed are those described by Geert Hofstede. They are related to power distance, uncertainty avoidance and the role of gender and the individual in the society. The level of diversity management is determined by the evaluation of corresponding national statistics.Findings from the correlations between cultural dimensions and the main national statistics were used to build up a framework by identifying core values which can foster diversity policies. Moreover, the combination of the four cultural dimensions in typologies identifies countries in the European Union which have a better and worse predisposition, solely with regards to their national culture, to adopt measures toward diversity management.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc in its journal Theory Methodology Practice (TMP).

    Volume (Year): 5 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 01 ()
    Pages: 59-65

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:5:y:2010:i:01:p:59-65
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:5:y:2010:i:01:p:59-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.