IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Business Consulting in a Hungarian County

Listed author(s):
  • Ildikó Pelczné Gáll


    (University of Miskolc)

  • Ágnes Tokár-Szadai


    (University of Miskolc)

Registered author(s):

    Our institution has made a survey among consulting firms and enterprises using consultations, enterprises not using consultations, but planning to do so and those not using and not planning to use any consultations. In the survey 362 enterprises from B.-A.-Z. county and 83 consulting firms participated chosen by representative sampling. In the article we demonstrate that half of the respondents have used or been planning to use the service in B.-A.-Z county After evaluating the survey we can establish that the most important reason why entrepreneurs turn to consultants is the special knowledge and experiment of the expert in the given region. The most important consulting area is still the accounting and finance in our county, but in the near future the forging ahead of strategic, IT and the sales-marketing areas can be expected. The complexity of the offered service, the personal relationship and the undertaking deadline appear as the most important criteria of choosing the consultants.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc in its journal Theory Methodology Practice (TMP).

    Volume (Year): 1 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 01 ()
    Pages: 41-46

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:1:y:2002:i:01:p:41-46
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:1:y:2002:i:01:p:41-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.