IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mic/esfjrn/v2y2005i1p36-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Közigazgatási és területfejlesztési sajátosságok bemutatása KÖZTÉRKÉP segítségével a szlovák-magyar együttműködések támogatása érdekében

Author

Listed:
  • Éva G. Fekete

    (University of Miskolc)

Abstract

The North Hungarian Regional Development Agency (NORDA) and the Kassa District Regional Development Agency declared the launching of cross-border cooperation and the creation of services supporting the cooperation as their common objective in 2003. It was revealed that the structures of public administration and regional development should be analyzed in the Northern Hungarian region and the neighbouring Slovakian counties of Kassa and Besztercebánya. The aim of the analyses was to provide sufficient information in quantity and quality for those who are interested. The survey covered six areas: public administration, regional development, tasks of the authorities, education, civil organizations and successful projects. This job was carried out by professionals of the two regions with the assistance and management of the Centre for Regional Studies North Hungarian Department. This study contains the comparison of structures in these two countries and the summary of the crucial conclusions. Comparing the possible areas of cooperation and the structures determining the framework of cooperation, it can be concluded that the structure of regional development objectives can be harmonized though cross-border cooperation, which is a more important priority in Hungary. Both countries consider employment, environment protection and the development of SMEs to be pivotal issues. Besides, transportation and the improvement of the quality of life could be fields of cooperation. The actors of regional development are similar, but in Hungary the institutional structure is more differentiated. The professional background is developed in both countries with the difference that in Hungary several private experts work, while in Slovakia experts can be found primarily in public agencies. The plans and the planning process have a different significance - Slovakian plans also contain defined project ideas, in Hungary this approach has already lost its significance. The support and regulation needed for the realization of cooperation ideas became almost the same because of the EU membership. The complicatedness of the authorization process, however, makes the assistance of a national expert indispensable. Information systems, which help the process of regional development providing data and information, are established, their operation, however, is far from perfect. Disseminating information at local level and the provision of interactivity are the biggest problems. This study may establish a common programming process which makes local initiatives continuous, predictable and makes synergies completely utilizable. This process shall promote the creation of partnership relations among local development actors, establish the professional background needed for future common strategies and prepare the ground for making contacts and common projects. The planning of cross-border cooperation and the realization of common projects shall become much easier and prompted because both countries are EU members. The geographical, historic, economic and social interdependence opens the gates for cooperation between Southeast Slovakia and North Hungary.

Suggested Citation

  • Éva G. Fekete, 2005. "Közigazgatási és területfejlesztési sajátosságok bemutatása KÖZTÉRKÉP segítségével a szlovák-magyar együttműködések támogatása érdekében," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 2(1), pages 36-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:mic:esfjrn:v:2:y:2005:i:1:p:36-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gtk.uni-miskolc.hu/files/285
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mic:esfjrn:v:2:y:2005:i:1:p:36-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vgtmihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.