IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Students’ and Teachers’ Attitudes toward E-study and Teaching Methods in Higher Education

  • Viktorija Sulcic

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

Registered author(s):

    The paper presents the results of research on teachers’ and students’ preferences for various teaching and learning methods used in higher education. In our study we found that despite our expectations teachers are not too keen on conventional teaching methods. Interestingly, these methods are even more suitable for students than for teachers. However, research has confirmed our hypothesis that students and teachers in favor of e-study are not fond of conventional teaching methods. According to the survey, e-study is more appropriate for part-time students. However, we were unable to confirm the hypothesis that the school’s equipment and attitude toward ict has been an impact on teachers’ preference for e-study.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: full text in Slovene
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract in English
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper in its journal Management.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 043-059

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:043-059
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Cankarjeva 5, SI-6104 Koper, PO BOX 345
    Phone: 05 610 20 00
    Fax: 05 610 20 15
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:043-059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen Jezovnik)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.