IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v49y2026i1p183-210.html

Classical competition and equilibrium: an agent-based analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan F. Cogliano
  • Roberto Veneziani

Abstract

In A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System, Pasinetti (1960) lays out the foundations of what has been dubbed the canonical classical model. He proves the model to be logically consistent and determinate in all of its macro-economic features, and derives the equilibrium values of all key variables independently of demand conditions. The model thus provides macroeconomic foundations to the classical theory of distribution. This paper examines the decentralized, competitive mechanism underlying the macroeconomic outcomes. First, we model a classical economy with capitalists, workers, and landlords and define the notion of a Classical Competitive Equilibrium (CCE). A unique CCE exists in a large class of convex classical economies, and the resulting income distribution coincides with that of Pasinetti’s canonical classical model. Second, we use an agent-based model in order to examine more explicitly the decentralized competitive mechanisms at play in the classical economy. We show that a simple competitive interaction between boundedly rational agents with localized knowledge generates classical gravitational dynamics with the key distributive variables oscillating around their equilibrium values.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani, 2026. "Classical competition and equilibrium: an agent-based analysis," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 183-210, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:183-210
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2025.2544050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2025.2544050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2025.2544050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:183-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.