IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v45y2022i3p339-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More fiscally responsible: Democrat or Republican presidents?

Author

Listed:
  • Peter N. Hess

Abstract

Evidence is reviewed that national economic performance generally has been better under Democrat presidents. It is likely, but not necessarily true, however, that better economic performance is related to greater fiscal responsibility. A brief history of federal budget deficits and the gross federal debt for the last seven decades is followed by discussion of why federal budget deficits matter. A simple model is estimated where the shares of federal budget deficits in gross domestic products over the 72-year period from 1950 to 2021 are regressed on the civilian unemployment rate, indicating the state of the economy, and controlling for whether a Democrat or Republican is president and for years the U.S. was engaged in war. An Index of Fiscal Discipline is then regressed on the growth rate in real gross domestic product, again controlling for the party in the White House and war years. The results show that Democrat presidents have been significantly more fiscally responsible.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter N. Hess, 2022. "More fiscally responsible: Democrat or Republican presidents?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 339-358, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:45:y:2022:i:3:p:339-358
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2022.2094276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2022.2094276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2022.2094276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:45:y:2022:i:3:p:339-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.