IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v41y2018i1p56-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

J. M. Keynes’ influence on institutional portfolio management

Author

Listed:
  • J. E. Woods

Abstract

In the earlier part of his portfolio management career, J. M. Keynes pursued a short-term, asset allocation-based speculative approach to portfolio management, only to abandon it in the early 1930s in favor of a long-term, security selection approach based on identifying intrinsic value. It was the earlier Keynes who endorsed E. L. Smith’s 1924 U.S. monograph, Common Stocks as Long Term Investments, encouraging his insurance company contacts to conduct a similar study in the United Kingdom. This suggestion was taken up in the 1920s and 1930s by U.K. insurance actuaries, whose lead was followed post-1945 by pension fund actuaries. Among the latter, George Ross Goobey is the most well-known, his name being closely associated with the Cult of the Equity, which, with the increasing formalization of institutional portfolio management over the last two or three decades, has transmuted into the Cult of the Benchmark. Underlying this latter cult is the emphasis on asset allocation, which can be traced back to Smith’s monograph. It is ironic that Keynes’ enduring influence is more likely to be felt through his endorsement of Smith rather than by the adoption of the genuine investment approach of his later career.

Suggested Citation

  • J. E. Woods, 2018. "J. M. Keynes’ influence on institutional portfolio management," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 56-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:41:y:2018:i:1:p:56-82
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2017.1423232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2017.1423232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2017.1423232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:41:y:2018:i:1:p:56-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.