IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Liquidity traps or Minsky crises: a critical review of the recent U.S. recession and Japan's Heisei recession in the 1990s

  • Peter C. Y. Chow
  • Kevin R. Foster
Registered author(s):

    This paper reviews the Japanese growth recession from 1991 to 2001 and the recent U.S. financial crisis to determine the relevancy of the "liquidity trap" hypothesis (due originally to Keynes updated by Krugman) and a Minsky crisis hypothesis. To evaluate the Minsky hypothesis, we use the same data series that he used in his 1986 analysis and follow in his footsteps. These data clearly show increasing financial stress and fragility by 2005 in the United States. We find that elements of both hypotheses are useful in describing economic conditions and thus guiding policy choices. Current Fed policy in vastly expanding its balance sheet to support the financial sector is just the sort of policy that Minsky might have advocated.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.

    Volume (Year): 32 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 4 (July)
    Pages: 571-590

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:32:y:2010:i:4:p:571-590
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:32:y:2010:i:4:p:571-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.