Reorienting history (of economics)
In his response to my original paper "The (Confused) State of Equilibrium Analysis in Modern Economics: An Explanation," Weintraub sets forth a competing account of the nature of equilibrium theorizing in economics. Weintraub supposes (1) his account is better because (2) his approach to understanding economics is more historical than my own. I suggest that neither of these claims is correct.
Volume (Year): 27 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=109348|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:27:y:2005:i:3:p:455-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.