Reorienting history (of economics)
In his response to my original paper "The (Confused) State of Equilibrium Analysis in Modern Economics: An Explanation," Weintraub sets forth a competing account of the nature of equilibrium theorizing in economics. Weintraub supposes (1) his account is better because (2) his approach to understanding economics is more historical than my own. I suggest that neither of these claims is correct.
Volume (Year): 27 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=109348|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:27:y:2005:i:3:p:455-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.