IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v60y2026i2p443-448.html

How Variations in Institutional Structures by Country Differentiate the Power of Social Network Platforms: The Case of TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo C. S. Siu

Abstract

In this article, I epitomize arguments on the essence and dynamic nature of economic power in Original Institutional Economics. Following these arguments, I explicate how a major category of platform corporations—social network platforms (SNPs)—gain their power in a global sense. Since power stems from institutional structures and is also subject to countervailing power, which varies across countries, the same can be said for the power of SNPs. To illustrate this, I examine the case of TikTok and argue that although SNPs have powerful algorithms to boost the network effect by disseminating specific types of influential media/educational contents to habituate the social masses in pursuit of their pecuniary/predatory interests, specific manifestations and sustainability of their power are actually differentiated by the political and economic institutions in different countries. To conclude, I argue that although challenging, effective policies and coordination between governments are necessary to mitigate the possible negative influences exerted by these SNPs

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo C. S. Siu, 2026. "How Variations in Institutional Structures by Country Differentiate the Power of Social Network Platforms: The Case of TikTok," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 443-448, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:443-448
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2026.2657219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2026.2657219
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2026.2657219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:443-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.