IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v60y2026i2p394-399.html

Revisiting “The Menace of Competition and Gambling Deregulation”

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas E. Lambert

Abstract

This article continues the analysis of gambling deregulation from an institutional economics perspective done in the article “The Menace of Competition and Gambling Deregulation” by Atkinson, Nichols, and Oleson. John R. Commons’ concept of the “menace of competition” is used to analyze how gambling industry laws have been gradually changed in the last decades of the twentieth century, which, in turn, helps the industry to grow throughout the United States. Since the article’s publication, much has changed with gambling in the US. Sports gambling has grown dramatically since it was allowed beyond Nevada beginning in 2018, and casinos and lotteries have somewhat peaked. They are not growing as in the past, and horse racing gambling has shrunk dramatically. Charitable gaming has also suffered, and dog racing has almost disappeared. Additionally, online gambling has made it easier than ever before to make wagers and play lotteries and slots. As gambling has proliferated across the US since the late 1970s, some of the newly legal forms of gambling have cannibalized much of the revenues of other ones that have been around longer. Not only can Commons’ writings still be used to assess recent developments, but also those of Paul A. Baran and Paul M. Sweezey and Thorstein Veblen.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas E. Lambert, 2026. "Revisiting “The Menace of Competition and Gambling Deregulation”," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 394-399, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:394-399
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2026.2657211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2026.2657211
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2026.2657211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:394-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.