IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v59y2025i4p1097-1110.html

From the Narratives We Create to the Lies We Tell: Disabling Some Myths of Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Oz Solon Chovghi Iazdi
  • Laís Fernanda de Azevedo
  • Jonattan Rodriguez Castelli

Abstract

Social inequality has a multifaceted character, and any analysis of it is built within the scope of comparisons between people and groups of people that are limited to a specific social context. To understand this phenomenon, we start from the narrative character of personal, individual, and social identities to assess how enabling myths sustain the perpetuation of inequality in contemporary societies. Particularly, three systemic enabling myths of inequality are discussed: 1) the myth of meritocracy, 2) the myth of education as a universal emancipator, and 3) the myth of equal rights in the course of the full exercise of citizenship. It is concluded that the non-universalization of education, the wide distortions of cultural capital, and the asymmetry of the substantive distribution of rights during the full exercise of citizenship contribute to making inequalities systemic, supported by enabling myths that restrict the reformulation of an individual’s self-narrative capability, limiting the possibility of challenging the status quo.

Suggested Citation

  • Oz Solon Chovghi Iazdi & Laís Fernanda de Azevedo & Jonattan Rodriguez Castelli, 2025. "From the Narratives We Create to the Lies We Tell: Disabling Some Myths of Inequality," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 1097-1110, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:4:p:1097-1110
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2025.2575147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2025.2575147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2025.2575147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:4:p:1097-1110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.