IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v59y2025i2p619-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prior Product Knowledge Bias about NGP Goods Affects Post-Purchase Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Mesly

Abstract

This study delves into the economic consequences of prior product knowledge in post-purchase satisfaction surveys, focusing on the used car and real estate sectors as case examples, for so-called NGP goods. I resort to the five-step purchasing model and focus on the link between the step of information gathering and the post-purchase step, whereby market agents are seen or act with dubious motives. This research seeks to provide these embryonic yet valuable insights through linear regressions and path analysis. My study introduces my novel concept of the NGP framework, which refers to the interplay between consumer needs (N), objectives/goals (G), and preferences (P) in relation to products of high economic and/or emotional value, thereby enriching the current understanding of buying behavior and economic theory about unique kinds of products, such as Veblen and Giffen goods. I offer practical recommendations for businesses aiming to minimize the prior product-knowledge bias-related impacts. The findings can guide companies in designing more effective survey instruments and making informed economic decisions based on accurate assessment of customer feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Mesly, 2025. "Prior Product Knowledge Bias about NGP Goods Affects Post-Purchase Surveys," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(2), pages 619-637, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:2:p:619-637
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2025.2493587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2025.2493587
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2025.2493587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:2:p:619-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.