IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v56y2022i2p607-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Our Toxic Bill of Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt J. Keiser

Abstract

Franklin Roosevelt’s famous “Four Freedoms” and “Second Bill of Rights” are steeped in the empirical realism of Original Institutional Economics (OIE). FDR’s intent was to supplant elements of the self-destructive illogic of capitalism with instrumentalist policies strongly reflective of OIE. Influenced during his first administration by Rexford Tugwell and other institutionalists, FDR’s proposed remedies for a structurally malfunctioning economy continued to exhibit enduring OIE influences throughout his four terms in office, culminating with the Four Freedoms (1941) and the Second Bill of Rights (1944).Alarming shifts in the political economy landscape of contemporary America suggest the need for an ongoing examination of the role of countervailing power in reversing the terrifying trend toward authoritarianism. Rugged, boorish individualism and negative, faddish personal freedoms saturate American culture paradoxically propping up past-binding institutions of corporate hegemony which undercut substantive positive freedoms and democracy. The time is nigh for renewed calls for a Second Bill of Rights. This article explores Tugwell’s thoughts on basic rights and responsibilities of citizens/businessmen and their influence on Roosevelt and reciprocal influences of Roosevelt on Tugwell as part and parcel of the OIE legacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt J. Keiser, 2022. "Our Toxic Bill of Rights," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 607-615, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:56:y:2022:i:2:p:607-615
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2022.2065865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2022.2065865
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2022.2065865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:56:y:2022:i:2:p:607-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.