IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v55y2021i2p509-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Institutional Perspective on Unemployment Insurance Programs: Historical Debates and Future Policy Reforms in the Coronavirus Recession

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Scorsone
  • Sarah Klammer

Abstract

In 2020 as the coronavirus pandemic created the conditions for a major recession, debates erupted over the structure and funding of unemployment insurance programs. The prior 2008–09 recession had already decimated many state unemployment programs, and along with major shifts in the workforce (including the gig economy), major policy questions surrounded the structure and funding of this state-national program. Stimulus efforts in early 2020 provided some temporary relief, but offered no permanent structural change on par with this shift in the workforce. As these programs end and no definitive structural changes are in sight, a number of think tanks including the Economic Policy Institute and the Century Foundation are advocating for major changes in unemployment insurance. Using the Commons ethical ideal type framework, this article explores the basic foundations of the employment relationship in a historical context and whether it has changed in a way that directly impacts the policy of unemployment insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Scorsone & Sarah Klammer, 2021. "An Institutional Perspective on Unemployment Insurance Programs: Historical Debates and Future Policy Reforms in the Coronavirus Recession," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 509-515, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:55:y:2021:i:2:p:509-515
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2021.1913377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2021.1913377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2021.1913377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:55:y:2021:i:2:p:509-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.