IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v52y2018i1p136-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Confidence Paradox: Can Confidence Account for Business Cycles?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Lainé

Abstract

In matters of investment expectations, investors rely both on a forecast and on an estimate of the reliability of this forecast, which prompts the feeling of confidence. Although confidence “is one of the major determinants” of investment decisions in John Maynard Keynes’s theory, the fluctuations of which account for the “essential character of the Trade Cycle,” it has been relatively little studied in economics. The purpose of this article is to draw on the headway of modern psychology, entrepreneurship, and neuroscience in order to propose an explanation of business cycles based on the cycles of confidence. Economists call this explanation a “paradox” since the very conditions of the economic boom may set the stage for a downturn. Conversely, the fact that confidence is low may gradually induce an improvement of entrepreneurs’ decisions and thus of the economic context. The basic mechanism pertains to a possible discrepancy between the two dimensions of investment: demand (short-term effects) and supply (long-term effects). Confidence seems to have a major impact on cognitive effort, on the number of data sought, the way they are analyzed, on creativity and alertness, on the type of reasoning, and the causal ascription of events.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Lainé, 2018. "The Confidence Paradox: Can Confidence Account for Business Cycles?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 136-156, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:52:y:2018:i:1:p:136-156
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2018.1430946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430946
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:52:y:2018:i:1:p:136-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.