Notes and Communications: Between Absolutism and Relativism: The Economist's Search for a Middle Ground
Clarence Ayres wished to avoid moral relativism or agnosticism in the social sciences, yet he also rejected what he called the âtranscendentalâ epistemology of classical philosophy, an epistemology grounded in the desire to know absolute or ultimate truths. He wanted to find a middle ground between absolutism and relativism by separating âtechnologyâ from âceremony,â and by replacing the ends/means >i>dichotomy>/i> with an ends/means >i>continuum>/i>. This paper examines his articulation of the issues, and in this context also examines the work of two more recent theorists, Gary Becker and Richard Posner. We conclude that Ayres' epistemological middle ground remains elusive.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:44:y:2010:i:3:p:819-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ian Winship)or (Chris Nguyen)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.