IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/ijpoec/v54y2025i2p198-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

There Are Different Ways to Organize a Business: Learning Cooperation at School – The Case of Wisconsin in the 1930s

Author

Listed:
  • Alexia Blin

Abstract

In 1935, Wisconsin adopted a law that made mandatory the teaching of cooperation (both agricultural and consumer cooperation) in the state public schools. This act testifies to a period of time when many U.S. progressives thought important to discuss the variety of forms that business organizations could take. While current progressives in the U.S. are said to draw part of their inspiration in terms of political economy from periods such as the New Deal, it does not seem that the active promotion of cooperative businesses is part of their repertoire yet. More generally, cooperatives as democratic forms of business have more or less disappeared from mainstream economics, economic education and public discourse. This article delves into the history of this 1935 law to study the political character and implication of its passage. While it seems to have been adopted in an atmosphere of consensus, the analysis of the way it was implemented shows that it touched upon controversial questions, regarding the role that the state should play in defining legitimate forms of businesses. After 1939, the law came under attack in a context of growing anti-communism, and it progressively fell into oblivion after the 1950s.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexia Blin, 2025. "There Are Different Ways to Organize a Business: Learning Cooperation at School – The Case of Wisconsin in the 1930s," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 198-214, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:ijpoec:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:198-214
    DOI: 10.1080/08911916.2025.2525029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08911916.2025.2525029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08911916.2025.2525029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:ijpoec:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:198-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MIJP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.